Skip to main content

 

Risk of higher volat­il­ity for stocks is rising

The spike in volat­il­ity in equity mar­kets late last week might well be a fore­taste of things to come. Mar­kets are head­ing into the uncer­tain out­comes of the midterm elec­tions in the US amid rising wor­ries over the risk of intens­i­fied con­flict in Iran and investor ques­tions about the rol­lout of AI infra­struc­ture.

There have been signs that a pick-up in volat­il­ity had been com­ing. Equity mar­kets have been remark­ably resi­li­ent this year. Almost unbe­liev­ably so.

Wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have triggered higher volat­il­ity in sov­er­eign bond and com­mod­ity mar­kets.

But indices of investor expect­a­tions of equity volat­il­ity implied by options trad­ing — the Vix index in the US and the Vstoxx index in Europe — have been rel­at­ively calm with an aver­age level of 16.3 and 17.7 per cent, respect­ively, over the past three months, in line with longterm aver­ages. The so-called fear gauge indices appeared “fear­less” until mid­way through last week.

The most com­mon explan­a­tion is the strong earn­ings growth driven by sig­ni­fic­ant cap­ital expendit­ure on the AI value chain, from hyper­scale data centres and semi­con­duct­ors to memory chips and energy infra­struc­ture.

Fiscal defi­cits with large tax cuts in the US and defence spend­ing in Europe have also con­trib­uted to rising cor­por­ate profits.

The recent resi­li­ence is des­pite expect­a­tions that the wars in Ukraine and Iran increas­ingly appear to have little pro­spect of a res­ol­u­tion any­time soon.

The risk of an escal­a­tion where both the straits of Hor­muz and of Bab al-Mandeb can be shut in the con­text of depleted global energy reserves should have led to higher equity volat­il­ity risk premia. It did not.

Hav­ing lost the argu­ment that infla­tion would be “trans­it­ory” in 2022, cent­ral banks are not tak­ing any chances and have embarked on a new tight­en­ing cycle with more rises expec­ted by the US Fed­eral Reserve, the European Cent­ral Bank, the Bank of Eng­land and the Bank of Japan over the next six to 12 months.

The sub­sequent rise in global bond yields will even­tu­ally force fiscal con­sol­id­a­tion as debt ser­vi­cing costs rise, increas­ing fears around sus­tain­ab­il­ity.

Higher bond yield volat­il­ity should have increased equity volat­il­ity — as the stream of future earn­ings that under­pins stock valu­ations is dis­coun­ted by the com­bin­a­tion of bond yields and equity risk premia.

Even cor­por­ate credit pri­cing has come under pres­sure in both invest­ment grade and high-yield sec­tors.

So why did equity index volat­il­ity remain sub­dued? Is equity sen­ti­ment some­how immune to rising interest rates, geo­pol­it­ical risks and higher credit spreads?

Well, the under­ly­ing pic­ture for indi­vidual stocks has been a dif­fer­ent story

om the broad index. When the gains of a given sec­tor or stocks are off­set by the losses of another, the index moves very little.

For example, oil and gas com­pan­ies versus trans­port­a­tion com­pan­ies, AI hard­ware versus AI soft­ware, com­pan­ies that bene­fit from higher interest rates such as fin­an­cials versus those that suf­fer, like util­it­ies.

Look­ing at equity index per­form­ance can be as mis­lead­ing as look­ing at the tip of an ice­berg, espe­cially for volat­il­ity. And we are now see­ing high sec­tor rota­tion by investors and the dis­per­sion of stock returns. Take, for example, the Stoxx Europe 50 index.

If you look at all the pos­sible pairs of single stocks in the index, the pro­por­tion with a neg­at­ive cor­rel­a­tion for three-month peri­ods over the past five years has risen to an unpre­ced­en­ted high of 30 per cent. It is 40 per cent for Wall Street’s S&P 500 index.

Apart from cur­rent invest­ment themes such as the energy sup­ply and AI demand shock, such “social dis­tan­cing” dynam­ics might also be a symp­tom of a new mar­ket struc­ture, reflect­ing the more aggress­ive deploy­ment of sys­tem­atic long-short invest­ing strategies.

Equity volat­il­ity risk is being trans­formed and stored in neg­at­ively cor­rel­ated pairs. A broad change in the cor­rel­a­tion of these stock pairs could gradu­ally, or sud­denly, force more com­pon­ents of the index to move in the same dir­ec­tion.

The res­ult could be sharply higher index volat­il­ity if, for instance, the odds of a reces­sion increase mater­i­ally.

Mar­kets have an equi­val­ent to the law of con­ser­va­tion of energy in phys­ics. Risk is never des­troyed, only trans­formed. We can see how risk is trans­form­ing and the mani­fest­a­tion of it in equity mar­kets is com­ing sooner than many think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog