Skip to main content

 

Microsoft gives data centre hope­fuls a real­ity check

Microsoft pulled the plug on a deal with neocloud Nscale

Noth­ing inter­feres with a com­pany’s plans to go pub­lic like a large cus­tomer get­ting cold feet.

Neo­cloud Nscale, which is tar­get­ing a New York list­ing at a $35bn valu­ation, will need to rethink its assump­tions after Microsoft pulled the plug on a deal to lease com­put­ing capa­city at a UK data centre.

The US tech giant called time on its deal because the Essex data centre — a smallish part of its total spend with Nscale — is unlikely to be sup­plied with power until after 2030.

That is not just a blow to Nvidia-backed Nscale, which counts former Meta exec­ut­ives Sir Nick Clegg and Sheryl Sand­berg as dir­ect­ors, but to its peers too, as it exposes the mul­tiple fault­lines run­ning through this fast-grow­ing slice of the AI sec­tor.

Neo­clouds rely on mul­tiple mov­ing parts: a power sup­ply is a must for secur­ing fat long-term con­tracts, but so are chips, infra­struc­ture and multi-faceted fin­an­cing, much of which is required upfront.

Once all those com­pon­ents are in place, the res­ult­ing agree­ments can run into big num­bers: the value of Nscale’s con­trac­ted rev­enue, in effect its order book, has crossed $100bn, roughly 40 times the value of act­ive busi­ness as at end-August.

There is a lot of exe­cu­tion risk nestled in that fig­ure. No power or chips; no dice. Those con­tracts rely on the deploy­ment of 461,000 GPUs; or almost 20 times what Nscale cur­rently has.

Chips in today’s warp speed tech­no­logy have a lim­ited shelf life. Nscale, like its peers, reck­ons it can recon­tract obsol­ete chips to smal­ler enter­prises, say, or to those look­ing to handle more mundane tasks. But there is no pre­ced­ent for this.

With an eye to bot­tle­necks and sup­ply con­straints, cli­ents have been care­ful to tie down their ter­min­a­tion rights. Fron­tier lab Anthropic, which together with Microsoft fills out near90 per cent of Nscale’s back­log, gives only “lim­ited relief” in the event of sup­ply-chain delays.

Its tranche-by-tranche deliv­ery sched­ule allows for ter­min­a­tion at reg­u­lar steps if dead­lines are missed. Some other con­tracts are on-demand, and could van­ish at any time.

Still, none of these risks are espe­cially new; Nscale delin­eated as many in its pre-list­ing fil­ing. So assum­ing its pro­posed IPO goes ahead — bold call as that would be given the num­ber of data centre list­ings that have fallen by the way­side — how should investors value it? Mod­estly, is the answer.

Rev­enue clocked in at $141mn in the first half; assum­ing its stonk­ing first-half growth rate con­tin­ues for the rest of 2026 gives full-year sales of $420mn. Put­ting that on the same mul­tiple as peer Nebius would imply a valu­ation of just over $6bn — and not even that if using CoreWeave’s measly mul­tiple. The US neo­cloud’s shares have halved in the past six months.

Neo­clouds’ fail­ure to flick all the neces­sary switches will shunt more sales over to their big­ger brethren — data centre build­ers and oper­at­ors with capa­city already avail­able, or suf­fi­cient clout and cap­ital to get things done on time.

For hyper­scalers such as SpaceX, this is a boon. It’s not just the met­eor­o­lo­gical clouds that carry a sil­ver lin­ing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog