China Calls New Zealand a ‘Pawn’ After Espionage Accusation

Save

Translate

1:53

Takeaways by Bloomberg AI

    China accused New Zealand of acting as a “pawn for anti-China forces” after its intelligence agency said Beijing was conducting espionage against the country on a significant scale.

    The Chinese embassy in Wellington said Friday that a New Zealand Security Intelligence Service report this week “fabricates and hypes” the “China interference” and “China threat” narratives.

    “We firmly oppose this and will never accept it,” the statement said. “Serving as a pawn for anti-China forces will ultimately backfire. Manufacturing distractions in foreign relations will not solve New Zealand’s own problems — it will only prove counterproductive.”

    The clash adds to growing strains between Wellington and Beijing, which have traded diplomatic barbs in recent months over China’s military activity in the Pacific, New Zealand lawmakers’ ties with Taiwan and comments by Foreign Minister Winston Peters.

    The tensions over this week’s report also highlight New Zealand’s delicate balancing act between its role with the so-called Five Eyes security partners — including Australia, the US, the UK and Canada — and China, its largest trading partner.

    Read more on New Zealand-China relations:

    The NZSIS report, issued Thursday, singled out China, saying that while there are several states that conduct espionage against New Zealand, China is the only country doing it at scale.

    It also gave a case study, saying Purple Mountain Observatory, an organization based in China with close links to its government, was found in the past year attempting to install ground-based space infrastructure in New Zealand. The South Pacific nation’s strategic location makes it an ideal place to install the equipment, which is designed to track satellites and space debris and is also attractive for foreign states seeking to advance military capabilities and intelligence operations, the report said.

    “They worked with a local company that was likely unaware of the equipment’s capability to collect intelligence of military value and would have no idea who was receiving the data,” the NZSIS said.

    Follow all new stories by Ainsley Thomson
    Get Alerts
    Save

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog